Brandon Thatch vs. Benson Henderson
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Brandon Thatch
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.82 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Benson Henderson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 18 | 11 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.03 · 18 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 43 documented bouts
In the UFC: 10-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Brandon Thatch
Distance 80.2% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 15.5% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 4.3% (norm 8.1%)
Benson Henderson
Distance 74.4% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 12.3% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 13.3% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Brandon Thatch
Head 71.9% (norm 78.3%) · Body 16.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.9% (norm 8.0%)
Benson Henderson
Head 66.8% (norm 78.0%) · Body 17.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 15.3% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Thatch L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Henderson L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 79 / 223 | 35.4% | 38.5% | 520 / 1340 | 38.8% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 43 | 72.1% | 67.8% | 154 / 222 | 69.4% | 67.5% |
| On the ground | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 67.0% | 152 / 239 | 63.6% | 68.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 63 / 200 | 31.5% | 36.4% | 362 / 1203 | 30.1% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 31 / 45 | 68.9% | 70.7% | 247 / 323 | 76.5% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 25 / 33 | 75.8% | 83.0% | 217 / 275 | 78.9% | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Lightweight: 204 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Thatch L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Henderson L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 79 / 227 | 34.8% | 39.1% | 364 / 1172 | 31.1% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 26 / 38 | 68.4% | 68.9% | 104 / 157 | 66.2% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 55 / 74 | 74.3% | 68.0% | 17 / 40 | 42.5% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 107 / 267 | 40.1% | 35.6% | 216 / 984 | 22.0% | 35.2% |
| To the body | 36 / 48 | 75.0% | 69.6% | 166 / 250 | 66.4% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 17 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.2% | 103 / 135 | 76.3% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Henderson has more cage time on record.