Ben Alloway vs.
Zak Cummings
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Ben Alloway
Full career not yet synced for Ben Alloway — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Zak Cummings
Full career not yet synced for Zak Cummings — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 4-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Ben Alloway
Distance 74.6% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 15.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 9.5% (norm 8.1%)
Zak Cummings
Distance 88.9% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 7.1% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 4.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Ben Alloway
Head 69.8% (norm 78.2%) · Body 17.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 12.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zak Cummings
Head 80.6% (norm 78.2%) · Body 10.6% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.8% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Alloway L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Cummings L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 20 / 47 | 42.6% | 38.6% | 398 / 1222 | 32.6% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 10 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 58 / 97 | 59.8% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 38 / 56 | 67.9% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 18 / 44 | 40.9% | 37.2% | 298 / 1108 | 26.9% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 93 / 146 | 63.7% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 103 / 121 | 85.1% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Alloway L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Cummings L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 18 / 48 | 37.5% | 39.0% | 387 / 934 | 41.4% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 46 | 41.3% | 68.9% | 26 / 46 | 56.5% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 9 / 19 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 35 / 45 | 77.8% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 30 / 87 | 34.5% | 35.6% | 297 / 807 | 36.8% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 12 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 77 / 125 | 61.6% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 74 / 93 | 79.6% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cummings has more cage time on record.