Bea Malecki vs. Josiane Nunes
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Bea Malecki
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.35 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 5 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500
Josiane Nunes
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.94 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Bea Malecki
Distance 91.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 3.2% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 5.5% (norm 7.5%)
Josiane Nunes
Distance 91.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 7.1% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 1.9% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Bea Malecki
Head 76.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 18.8% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 4.5% (norm 8.8%)
Josiane Nunes
Head 79.4% (norm 75.2%) · Body 15.0% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 5.6% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Malecki L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Nunes L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 160 / 365 | 43.8% | 38.3% | 330 / 807 | 40.9% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 11 / 13 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 43 / 63 | 68.3% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 13 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 9 / 17 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 117 / 307 | 38.1% | 37.7% | 254 / 704 | 36.1% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 51 / 75 | 68.0% | 70.0% | 85 / 133 | 63.9% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 16 / 18 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 43 / 50 | 86.0% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Malecki L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Nunes L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 175 / 466 | 37.6% | 41.3% | 356 / 761 | 46.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 25 | 40.0% | 74.7% | 18 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 16 / 27 | 59.3% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 129 / 392 | 32.9% | 38.1% | 250 / 640 | 39.1% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 31 / 66 | 47.0% | 73.2% | 77 / 105 | 73.3% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 27 / 35 | 77.1% | 80.9% | 63 / 65 | 96.9% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Nunes has more cage time on record.