Batgerel Danaa vs.
Brandon Davis
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Batgerel Danaa
Full career not yet synced for Batgerel Danaa — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Brandon Davis
Full career not yet synced for Brandon Davis — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Batgerel Danaa
Distance 89.7% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 3.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 6.7% (norm 6.5%)
Brandon Davis
Distance 94.1% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 3.1% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Batgerel Danaa
Head 85.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 8.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.3% (norm 8.4%)
Brandon Davis
Head 76.7% (norm 77.4%) · Body 10.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 13.1% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Danaa L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Davis L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 259 / 763 | 33.9% | 39.0% | 389 / 1068 | 36.4% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 18 / 31 | 58.1% | 68.7% | 28 / 35 | 80.0% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 34 / 57 | 59.6% | 70.2% | 20 / 32 | 62.5% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 238 / 723 | 32.9% | 34.9% | 247 / 870 | 28.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 34 / 74 | 45.9% | 66.8% | 73 / 116 | 62.9% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 39 / 54 | 72.2% | 79.4% | 117 / 149 | 78.5% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Danaa L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Davis L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 229 / 446 | 51.3% | 39.3% | 374 / 968 | 38.6% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 28 / 52 | 53.8% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 57 / 78 | 73.1% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 171 / 367 | 46.6% | 34.9% | 335 / 915 | 36.6% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 23 / 37 | 62.2% | 66.0% | 68 / 111 | 61.3% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 49 / 58 | 84.5% | 79.1% | 56 / 72 | 77.8% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Davis has more cage time on record.