Austin Lingo vs.
Jacob Kilburn
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Austin Lingo
Full career not yet synced for Austin Lingo — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Jacob Kilburn
Full career not yet synced for Jacob Kilburn — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Austin Lingo
Distance 98.3% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 1.6% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 0.1% (norm 6.5%)
Jacob Kilburn
Distance 94.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 4.3% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Austin Lingo
Head 82.7% (norm 77.4%) · Body 13.7% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 3.7% (norm 7.8%)
Jacob Kilburn
Head 84.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 11.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 4.8% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lingo L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Kilburn L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 264 / 697 | 37.9% | 40.9% | 62 / 195 | 31.8% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 4 / 9 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.2% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 183 / 586 | 31.2% | 37.2% | 47 / 174 | 27.0% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 66 / 97 | 68.0% | 68.2% | 11 / 23 | too few to rate | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 18 / 26 | 69.2% | 80.7% | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lingo L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Kilburn L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 317 / 756 | 41.9% | 39.2% | 95 / 179 | 53.1% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 6 / 11 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 68 / 81 | 84.0% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 172 / 557 | 30.9% | 35.9% | 144 / 240 | 60.0% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 97 / 157 | 61.8% | 67.9% | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 67 / 75 | 89.3% | 81.5% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lingo has more cage time on record.