Antonio Mendes vs.
Eric Schafer
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Antonio Mendes
Full career not yet synced for Antonio Mendes — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Eric Schafer
Full career not yet synced for Eric Schafer — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Antonio Mendes
Distance 58.8% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 29.4% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 11.8% (norm 10.4%)
Eric Schafer
Distance 72.4% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 9.8% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 17.8% (norm 10.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Antonio Mendes
Head 70.6% (norm 79.2%) · Body 23.5% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 5.9% (norm 9.7%)
Eric Schafer
Head 89.7% (norm 79.2%) · Body 6.8% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 3.4% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Mendes L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Schafer L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 4 / 10 | too few to rate | 41.4% | 61 / 296 | 20.6% | 41.4% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 25 / 40 | 62.5% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 55 / 73 | 75.3% | 72.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 3 / 12 | too few to rate | 38.9% | 110 / 367 | 30.0% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 71.9% | 19 / 28 | 67.9% | 71.9% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 12 / 14 | too few to rate | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Mendes L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Schafer L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 40.4% | 130 / 387 | 33.6% | 40.4% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 54 / 85 | 63.5% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 37 / 48 | 77.1% | 70.4% | 68 / 113 | 60.2% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 36 / 48 | 75.0% | 37.5% | 198 / 510 | 38.8% | 37.5% |
| To the body | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 35 / 53 | 66.0% | 72.3% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Schafer has more cage time on record.