Antonio Braga Neto vs.
Trevin Giles
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Antonio Braga Neto
Full career not yet synced for Antonio Braga Neto — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Trevin Giles
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 7 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 6 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.12 · 13 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 23 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Antonio Braga Neto
Distance 86.7% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 2.5% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 10.8% (norm 10.3%)
Trevin Giles
Distance 82.2% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 5.6% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 12.2% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Antonio Braga Neto
Head 86.7% (norm 78.0%) · Body 8.3% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 5.0% (norm 8.4%)
Trevin Giles
Head 82.9% (norm 78.0%) · Body 7.3% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 9.8% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Neto L/A | Acc | Middleweight med | Giles L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 25 / 104 | 24.0% | 40.5% | 369 / 736 | 50.1% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 32 / 50 | 64.0% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 12 / 13 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 86 / 109 | 78.9% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 30 / 104 | 28.8% | 38.9% | 363 / 742 | 48.9% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 6 / 10 | too few to rate | 71.7% | 46 / 65 | 70.8% | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 83.3% | 78 / 88 | 88.6% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Middleweight: 174 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Neto L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med | vs Giles L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 107 / 198 | 54.0% | 39.5% | 316 / 801 | 39.5% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 27 / 38 | 71.1% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 24 / 35 | 68.6% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 91 / 179 | 50.8% | 37.9% | 153 / 591 | 25.9% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 20 / 25 | 80.0% | 71.3% | 95 / 140 | 67.9% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 119 / 143 | 83.2% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Giles has more cage time on record.