Anshul Jubli vs.
Jeka Saragih
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Anshul Jubli
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.84 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 9 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Jeka Saragih
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 12 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.63 · 12 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 19 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Anshul Jubli
Distance 79.7% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 5.3% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 15.0% (norm 8.0%)
Jeka Saragih
Distance 76.1% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 6.5% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 17.4% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Anshul Jubli
Head 78.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 7.9%)
Jeka Saragih
Head 56.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 15.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 28.3% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Jubli L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Saragih L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 103 / 196 | 52.6% | 37.9% | 17 / 35 | 48.6% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 6 / 13 | too few to rate | 67.3% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 32 / 37 | 86.5% | 69.1% | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 99 / 193 | 51.3% | 35.0% | 9 / 26 | 34.6% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 28 / 39 | 71.8% | 69.1% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 14 / 14 | too few to rate | 81.9% | 10 / 13 | too few to rate | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Jubli L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Saragih L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 104 / 200 | 52.0% | 38.9% | 22 / 38 | 57.9% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.6% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 33 / 38 | 86.8% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 79 / 170 | 46.5% | 35.1% | 46 / 64 | 71.9% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 15 / 18 | too few to rate | 68.1% | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 18 / 21 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Saragih has more cage time on record.