Andre Fialho vs.
Cameron VanCamp
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Andre Fialho
Full career not yet synced for Andre Fialho — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
Cameron VanCamp
Full career not yet synced for Cameron VanCamp — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Andre Fialho
Distance 90.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 7.4% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 2.3% (norm 8.1%)
Cameron VanCamp
Distance 100.0% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Andre Fialho
Head 83.1% (norm 78.2%) · Body 11.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 5.3% (norm 8.4%)
Cameron VanCamp
Head 63.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 22.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 14.1% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Fialho L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | VanCamp L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 165 / 439 | 37.6% | 38.6% | 34 / 71 | 47.9% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 32 / 36 | 88.9% | 67.8% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 5 / 11 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 140 / 404 | 34.7% | 37.2% | 16 / 45 | 35.6% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 39 / 56 | 69.6% | 70.7% | 8 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 23 / 26 | 88.5% | 82.9% | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Fialho L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs VanCamp L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 300 / 599 | 50.1% | 39.0% | 31 / 58 | 53.4% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 45 / 58 | 77.6% | 68.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 38 / 50 | 76.0% | 68.0% | 10 / 11 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 224 / 503 | 44.5% | 35.6% | 34 / 60 | 56.7% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 112 / 154 | 72.7% | 69.6% | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 47 / 50 | 94.0% | 82.1% | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Fialho has more cage time on record.