Amanda Lemos vs. Leslie Smith
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Amanda Lemos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.18 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 8-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.9 wins over .500
Leslie Smith
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.55 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Amanda Lemos
Distance 79.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 8.4% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 12.3% (norm 5.0%)
Leslie Smith
Distance 84.1% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 14.5% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Amanda Lemos
Head 74.6% (norm 76.6%) · Body 16.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 8.6% (norm 9.1%)
Leslie Smith
Head 84.9% (norm 75.5%) · Body 9.5% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lemos L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Smith L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 360 / 717 | 50.2% | 38.3% | 354 / 995 | 35.6% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 62 / 76 | 81.6% | 72.6% | 116 / 171 | 67.8% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 79 / 111 | 71.2% | 75.0% | 7 / 17 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 318 / 674 | 47.2% | 35.4% | 345 / 1004 | 34.4% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 111 / 152 | 73.0% | 69.3% | 73 / 112 | 65.2% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 72 / 78 | 92.3% | 77.9% | 59 / 67 | 88.1% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lemos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Smith L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 306 / 686 | 44.6% | 39.7% | 391 / 905 | 43.2% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 147 / 184 | 79.9% | 71.2% | 125 / 160 | 78.1% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 115 / 146 | 78.8% | 74.4% | 15 / 20 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 317 / 673 | 47.1% | 36.0% | 341 / 857 | 39.8% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 141 / 190 | 74.2% | 68.7% | 91 / 119 | 76.5% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 110 / 153 | 71.9% | 79.1% | 99 / 109 | 90.8% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lemos has more cage time on record.