Amanda Cooper vs.
Anna Elmose
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Amanda Cooper
Full career not yet synced for Amanda Cooper — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.8 wins over .500
Anna Elmose
Full career not yet synced for Anna Elmose — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Amanda Cooper
Distance 80.7% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 2.5% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 16.8% (norm 5.0%)
Anna Elmose
Distance 79.9% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 7.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 12.9% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Amanda Cooper
Head 87.3% (norm 76.4%) · Body 7.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 4.8% (norm 9.1%)
Anna Elmose
Head 73.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 15.1% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 11.5% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cooper L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Elmose L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 112 / 318 | 35.2% | 38.3% | 48 / 111 | 43.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 72.6% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 55 / 66 | 83.3% | 75.0% | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 134 / 344 | 39.0% | 35.4% | 41 / 102 | 40.2% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 69.3% | 15 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 17 / 19 | too few to rate | 77.9% | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cooper L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Elmose L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 107 / 265 | 40.4% | 39.7% | 63 / 171 | 36.8% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 71.5% | 14 / 16 | too few to rate | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 41 / 52 | 78.8% | 74.4% | 10 / 14 | too few to rate | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 106 / 265 | 40.0% | 36.0% | 69 / 179 | 38.5% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 33 / 40 | 82.5% | 68.4% | 16 / 20 | too few to rate | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 18 / 22 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cooper has more cage time on record.