Aljamain Sterling vs. Marlon Moraes
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Aljamain Sterling
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 18 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.61 · 18 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 31 documented bouts
In the UFC: 16-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.3 wins over .500
Marlon Moraes
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 18 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.46 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 16 finish wins over 37 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +5.4 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Aljamain Sterling
Distance 77.2% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 10.1% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 12.7% (norm 6.4%)
Marlon Moraes
Distance 95.8% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 0.8% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 3.4% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Aljamain Sterling
Head 64.0% (norm 77.5%) · Body 23.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 12.7% (norm 8.4%)
Marlon Moraes
Head 79.3% (norm 77.5%) · Body 9.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 10.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Sterling L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Moraes L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 941 / 2066 | 45.5% | 39.2% | 267 / 684 | 39.0% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 209 / 270 | 77.4% | 69.0% | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 257 / 339 | 75.8% | 70.2% | 19 / 24 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 703 / 1712 | 41.1% | 35.3% | 189 / 566 | 33.4% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 443 / 622 | 71.2% | 66.9% | 46 / 70 | 65.7% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 261 / 341 | 76.5% | 79.2% | 55 / 78 | 70.5% | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Sterling L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Moraes L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 567 / 1534 | 37.0% | 39.4% | 264 / 692 | 38.2% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 92 / 134 | 68.7% | 70.6% | 24 / 30 | 80.0% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 72.1% | 102 / 129 | 79.1% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 355 / 1230 | 28.9% | 34.9% | 275 / 684 | 40.2% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 190 / 302 | 62.9% | 66.1% | 70 / 107 | 65.4% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 165 / 207 | 79.7% | 78.8% | 45 / 60 | 75.0% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Sterling has more cage time on record.