Alexandre Dantas vs.
Gan McGee
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Alexandre Dantas
Full career not yet synced for Alexandre Dantas — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Gan McGee
Full career not yet synced for Gan McGee — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Alexandre Dantas
Distance 17.0% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 2.1% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 80.9% (norm 9.3%)
Gan McGee
Distance 74.0% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 2.4% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 23.6% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Alexandre Dantas
Head 95.7% (norm 79.2%) · Body 2.1% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 2.1% (norm 7.6%)
Gan McGee
Head 93.7% (norm 79.2%) · Body 3.1% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 3.1% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dantas L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | McGee L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1 / 8 | too few to rate | 40.1% | 26 / 94 | 27.7% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 13 / 38 | 34.2% | 70.2% | 15 / 30 | 50.0% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 14 / 45 | 31.1% | 38.9% | 36 / 119 | 30.3% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 76.8% | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 76.8% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dantas L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs McGee L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 10 / 27 | 37.0% | 40.7% | 21 / 64 | 32.8% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 27 / 44 | 61.4% | 72.0% | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 37 / 69 | 53.6% | 38.8% | 24 / 72 | 33.3% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 75.1% | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 13 / 13 | too few to rate | 84.4% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — McGee has more cage time on record.