Aisling Daly vs.
Ericka Almeida
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Aisling Daly
Full career not yet synced for Aisling Daly — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500
Ericka Almeida
Full career not yet synced for Ericka Almeida — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Aisling Daly
Distance 32.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 20.4% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 47.4% (norm 5.0%)
Ericka Almeida
Distance 51.9% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 29.6% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 18.5% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Aisling Daly
Head 78.1% (norm 76.4%) · Body 17.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 4.1% (norm 9.1%)
Ericka Almeida
Head 82.7% (norm 76.4%) · Body 14.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 2.5% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Daly L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Almeida L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 16 / 63 | 25.4% | 38.3% | 16 / 42 | 38.1% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 28 / 40 | 70.0% | 72.6% | 13 / 24 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 58 / 93 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 3 / 15 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 71 / 153 | 46.4% | 35.4% | 23 / 67 | 34.3% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 25 / 35 | 71.4% | 69.3% | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 77.9% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Daly L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Almeida L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 21 / 56 | 37.5% | 39.7% | 23 / 48 | 47.9% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 35 | 57.1% | 71.5% | 22 / 33 | 66.7% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 8 / 20 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 55 / 96 | 57.3% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 32 / 87 | 36.8% | 36.0% | 67 / 136 | 49.3% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.4% | 18 / 25 | 72.0% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Daly has more cage time on record.